Your words mentioned, the cross is not in the bible. Neither is a triune God, neither is instructions for dividing the Church into 38,000 different denominations…each claiming to have the truth. Actually, no where in the Bible does it say the Bible is supposed to be our sole authority. In fact…it could not say that because when the books were written they were not compiled. We all know who compiled them…that pagan Catholic Church you left. So, the next time you open your Bible and refer the New Testament books…remember it was a pope and the Catholic church in the late 300’s that gave you that book…and you in turn spit in her face. Actually, the Bible you use is without several books. Luther and other ex-Catholics took them out. One of their arguments, they were never in Hebrew. You should know by now, the findings in the Dead Sea scrolls just 50 or so years ago…proved this argument was without merit. … their proposition about the Bible being the only source of the faith is proven wrong. The Bible in fact say the Church is the pillar and foundation of truth, not some future compilation of writting. It says the oral and written tradition is good. Good tradition is good and bad tradition is bad. Jesus never even said to write anything down, but he did say go out and teach. I want you back in the Catholic Church. Jesus wants you back? ~ Jeff Vaughan
Frequently, critics of our carefully prepared articles employ the sawed-off shotgun approach in their attempt to resist biblical truths represented in the pages of Gospel Gazette Online. They blast us with a critical barrage of extensive, rambling, unsubstantiated vagaries. Their arguments, hardly reasoned points, are difficult to extrapolate from their missives for any attempt at responding. The remarkable quotation above was excerpted from a post peppered with references to “birth control” and other sidebars.
The baseless assertion that the “cross” does not appear in the Bible is typical and representative of the biblical ignorance (i.e., uninformed) amply demonstrated in the criticism sampled above. The word “cross” appears 28 times in the Bible (Matthew 10:38; 16:24; 27:32, 40, 42; Mark 8:34; 10:21; 15:21, 30, 32; Luke 9:23; 14:27; 23:26; John 19:17, 19, 25, 31; 1 Corinthians 1:17-18; Galatians 5:11; 6:12, 14; Ephesians 2:16; Philippians 2:8; 3:18; Colossians 1:20; 2:14; Hebrews 12:2). Anyone who had ever read the Bible casually would know the cross is in the Bible. Such religious ignorance on obvious matters is hardly an authoritative position from which to offer any biblical criticism.
While it is true that the word “triune” does not appear in the Bible, that there are three persons in the Godhead, which is what our word “triune” means, is taught throughout the Bible. Some passages mention all three persons of the Godhead in one stroke of the inspired pen. “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:18).
It is true that God does not want so-called Christianity divided into thousands or even a couple of doctrinally contradictory groups (1 Corinthians 1:10-13). The fault lies not with God, of course, but with mankind who refuses to be directed by God, through his Word, the Bible. If everyone simply allowed the Bible to guide them, instead of following the whims of men (e.g., preachers, popes, etc.) and councils of men and women (e.g., apostles, conventions, etc.), their would be religious unity instead of the chaos that now exists (of which the Catholic Church is a primary participant).
The epistles or letters that comprise what we call the Bible were authoritative from the time they were initially penned. The Old Testament was compiled many hundreds of years before the Catholic Church or the pope came into existence; the Old Testament books were compiled before the first century and even the ministry of Jesus Christ. The New Testament epistles were circulated initially among the churches and were compiled around the close of the first century. That later councils of men and popes in the Catholic Church argued about which writings should be included and which should be excluded is immaterial. “And when this epistle is read among you, cause that it be read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and that ye likewise read the epistle from Laodicea” (Colossians 4:16). God did not choose, through his providence, to have the Laodicean epistle preserved, though he did choose to have the Colossian epistle preserved, which mentions the Laodicean epistle. Clearly, the original recipients of the inspired epistles were to regard them highly and circulate them among the churches.
Contrary to the critical claim, the Bible (through the various epistles that comprise it) does claim to be the sole authority of God. “Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you” (Deuteronomy 4:2). “Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar” (Proverbs 30:6). “I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed” (Galatians 1:6-9). “Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 3). “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book” (Revelation 22:18-19).
The supposed missing books that Catholics have in their Bible (which is immaterial anyway since to Catholicism the Bible is a dead letter) and that do not appear in other Bibles are writings that failed the tests of canonicity. They are apocryphal or pseudepigraphal, that is spurious or doubtful in authenticity or falsely ascribed to an inspired writer. Apocryphal and pseudepigraphal books contain factual errors that betray them as uninspired or contradict biblical books with which there is no doubt that they are inspired. However, since the Catholic position and that of the criticism above that the Bible is not authoritative, why be concerned over which books are in or not in the Bible?
The vague reference to the Dead Sea Scrolls does not support any contention represented in the criticism, and certainly not the inclusion of apocryphal or pseudepigraphal books in the biblical canon. No one denies that the apocryphal and pseudepigraphal books are old, just that they are inspired. Many thousands of old documents that do not pertain to religion at all (e.g., invoices, legal documents) have been unearthed through archaeology; being an antique document alone does not qualify something to be considered biblical. The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm rather than deny or alter the current canonicity of the Bible.
The biblical reference that the church is the pillar and ground of the truth does not pertain to origin of authority but to the responsibility of the church to propagate God’s truth, revealed to mankind in the Bible (1 Timothy 3:15). Jesus alone has all authority in heaven and in earth (Matthew 28:18). The responsibility of mankind (and collectively, the church) today is to proclaim God’s doctrine to the world, not make doctrine to displace the doctrine of God. “To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Ephesians 3:10-11).
Human tradition cannot compare with divine instruction; human tradition condemns. “But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” (Matthew 15:9). “O LORD, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps” (Jeremiah 10:23).
The assertion that Jesus did not tell anyone to write anything down is erroneous as well. First, Jesus delegated authority to his apostles (Matthew 16:19; 18:18), who wrote (e.g., Matthew, John, Peter). Second, 16 times in the Book of Revelation, Jesus instructed the apostle John to “write” (Revelation 1:1, 19; 2:1, 8, 12, 18; 3:1, 7, 12, 14; 10:4; 14:13; 19:9; 21:5).
Incidentally, it is no wonder the Catholic Church has so little regard for the Bible, since the Bible identifies and condemns it. “Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving” (1 Timothy 4:1-4). “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God” (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4). If not anticipating Catholic doctrine and the Catholic pope specifically, these verses apply to the Catholic Church and its pope.
Contrary to what was argued in the post, it would be easier to be a Catholic than to be a New Testament Christian. In truth, the Catholic Church is too young to be the church of the Bible, coming into existence fully with its first universally recognized Catholic pope (a word and doctrine absent from the Bible) about A.D. 605. I choose, rather, to be a New Testament Christian, a member of the church about which anyone can read in the Bible, the beginning of which one reads in Acts 2. The Lord and I earnestly desire all accountable souls decide to be Christians only, forsaking Catholicism and other manmade alternatives to pure Christianity as well as world religions.
